<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Reacties op: Bing! wordt echte Google killer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/</link>
	<description>All things online recruitment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:27:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Door: Plug: CareerSiteAdvisor TV &#124; Interviews &#124; Recruitment Matters - Alles over online recruitment</title>
		<link>http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-10136</link>
		<dc:creator>Plug: CareerSiteAdvisor TV &#124; Interviews &#124; Recruitment Matters - Alles over online recruitment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 10:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/#comment-10136</guid>
		<description>[...] aangezien Luke McKend aanwezig is hoop ik maar dat er vragen over Bing! en Google Wave worden gesteld. In relatie tot hun impact voor online recruitment en werkzoekers dan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] aangezien Luke McKend aanwezig is hoop ik maar dat er vragen over Bing! en Google Wave worden gesteld. In relatie tot hun impact voor online recruitment en werkzoekers dan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Door: Thomas Waldman</title>
		<link>http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-10120</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Waldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 11:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/#comment-10120</guid>
		<description>Bing is de witte vlag van Live. De extra features zijn leuk en wellicht best interessant voor hardcore searchers, maar google is niet &quot;kapot&quot;.  Het werkt naar voldoening voor al die surfers die gebruik maken van Google.  De incentive om over te stappen ontbreekt dus. 

Het merk is daarnaast dermate sterk dat geen Bing, Live of Wolfram Alpha die markt kan pakken.

Leuk dus maar geen killer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing is de witte vlag van Live. De extra features zijn leuk en wellicht best interessant voor hardcore searchers, maar google is niet &#8220;kapot&#8221;.  Het werkt naar voldoening voor al die surfers die gebruik maken van Google.  De incentive om over te stappen ontbreekt dus. </p>
<p>Het merk is daarnaast dermate sterk dat geen Bing, Live of Wolfram Alpha die markt kan pakken.</p>
<p>Leuk dus maar geen killer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Door: Marc Drees</title>
		<link>http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-10118</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Drees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/#comment-10118</guid>
		<description>Nog een interessant perspectief, &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.altimetergroup.com/2009/05/microsoft-bings-focus-on-decisions-is-smart----but-not-a-google-killer.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;dit keer van Charlene Li &lt;/a&gt;(een voormalige Forrester rakker):

&lt;em&gt;Bing&#039;s goal is to improve the search experience, and it does that well overall in an incremental way, but especially in four key categories - shopping, travel, local, and health -- by tailoring the experience to specific goals associated with those categories. Why these categories? Well, they are the ones that generate the most concentrated revenues from advertising, the ones where people need to make complex, multi-step decisions every day.&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;So Microsoft doesn&#039;t want to beat Google in terms of displacing it from it&#039;s lofty 70% dominant share of US searches. Rather, Microsoft is out to win more users in the most lucrative categories where advertisers want to influence decision making. This is a focused strategy, and a smart one for (distant) #3 player Microsoft to pursue not only against formidable general search players but also vertical leaders like Yelp and Kayak.

&lt;/em&gt;Verder is haar posting zeer de moeite waard om te lezen hoe Bing! verschilt van Google en wat de specifieke voordelen kunnen zijn vanuit het perspectief van de gebruiker.&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nog een interessant perspectief, <a href="http://blog.altimetergroup.com/2009/05/microsoft-bings-focus-on-decisions-is-smart----but-not-a-google-killer.html" rel="nofollow">dit keer van Charlene Li </a>(een voormalige Forrester rakker):</p>
<p><em>Bing&#8217;s goal is to improve the search experience, and it does that well overall in an incremental way, but especially in four key categories &#8211; shopping, travel, local, and health &#8212; by tailoring the experience to specific goals associated with those categories. Why these categories? Well, they are the ones that generate the most concentrated revenues from advertising, the ones where people need to make complex, multi-step decisions every day.</em></p>
<p><em>So Microsoft doesn&#8217;t want to beat Google in terms of displacing it from it&#8217;s lofty 70% dominant share of US searches. Rather, Microsoft is out to win more users in the most lucrative categories where advertisers want to influence decision making. This is a focused strategy, and a smart one for (distant) #3 player Microsoft to pursue not only against formidable general search players but also vertical leaders like Yelp and Kayak.</p>
<p></em>Verder is haar posting zeer de moeite waard om te lezen hoe Bing! verschilt van Google en wat de specifieke voordelen kunnen zijn vanuit het perspectief van de gebruiker.<em></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Door: Chris Stapper</title>
		<link>http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-10117</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 08:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/#comment-10117</guid>
		<description>Het was een voorbeeld!
Ooit ben ik fan geweest.:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Het was een voorbeeld!<br />
Ooit ben ik fan geweest.:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Door: Michiel</title>
		<link>http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-10116</link>
		<dc:creator>Michiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 08:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/#comment-10116</guid>
		<description>Dit klinkt wel alsof het consequenties gaat hebben voor bedrijven zoals o.a. Tradetracker.. Je gaat niet van Bing af en dus zal de reclame van de website waar je naar toe gaat minder of zelfs niet te zien zijn..?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dit klinkt wel alsof het consequenties gaat hebben voor bedrijven zoals o.a. Tradetracker.. Je gaat niet van Bing af en dus zal de reclame van de website waar je naar toe gaat minder of zelfs niet te zien zijn..?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Door: Marc Drees</title>
		<link>http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-10111</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Drees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 05:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/#comment-10111</guid>
		<description>@Chris:
Wat heb jij met Britney Spears?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris:<br />
Wat heb jij met Britney Spears?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Door: Chris Stapper</title>
		<link>http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-10107</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/#comment-10107</guid>
		<description>Ah, okay, dan heb ik te snel een conclusie getrokken. 

Deze nieuwe benadering van SEO zorgt er voor dat websites kunnen mikken op een specifiekere niche. En dat lijkt me voordelig. Je wil nu de #1 Britney Spears muzieksite zijn, of de #1 Britney Spears evenementen site, etc. Als je tenminste iets van Britney Spears wilt zijn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, okay, dan heb ik te snel een conclusie getrokken. </p>
<p>Deze nieuwe benadering van SEO zorgt er voor dat websites kunnen mikken op een specifiekere niche. En dat lijkt me voordelig. Je wil nu de #1 Britney Spears muzieksite zijn, of de #1 Britney Spears evenementen site, etc. Als je tenminste iets van Britney Spears wilt zijn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Door: Marc Drees</title>
		<link>http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-10105</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Drees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/#comment-10105</guid>
		<description>@Chris:
Dit is van Forrester, niet van Microsoft. Er is dus geen enkele bewuste reden om Yahoo! te noemen en Google niet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris:<br />
Dit is van Forrester, niet van Microsoft. Er is dus geen enkele bewuste reden om Yahoo! te noemen en Google niet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Door: Chris Stapper</title>
		<link>http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-10104</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/#comment-10104</guid>
		<description>Het klinkt heel interessant. In ieder geval een aanvulling op het huidige aanbod. Ik vind het ook grappig hoe ze bewust Yahoo wel noemen en google niet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Het klinkt heel interessant. In ieder geval een aanvulling op het huidige aanbod. Ik vind het ook grappig hoe ze bewust Yahoo wel noemen en google niet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Door: Marc Drees</title>
		<link>http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-10103</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Drees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://recruitmentmatters.nl/2009/05/28/bing-wordt-echte-google-killer/#comment-10103</guid>
		<description>Update: Bing! gaat live op 3 juni

En wat betekent Bing!? Hier een stuk van &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.forrester.com/marketing/2009/05/microsoft-announced-today-its-bing-search-engine-a-decision-engine-that-will-replace-livecom-worldwide-as-of-june-3-a-dist.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Forrester&lt;/a&gt;. Interessant leesvoer:

&lt;em&gt;What does Bing mean for interactive marketers?&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt; 

&lt;strong&gt;More, quality search inventory.&lt;/strong&gt; Today most advertisers buy search ads just with Google and Yahoo because Microsoft has a measly 8% share of searches -- not enough reach to make buying search ads with MS worth the trouble.  Forrester expects Bing to change that.  We expect Bing to appeal to the savvy searcher seeking more relevant search results.
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;A new approach to SEO.&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; Instead of Bing showing all sites that match the search engine&#039;s algorithm, it will show just three results for a given &quot;subcategory&quot; related to a search.  For example, a search for &quot;Britney Spears&quot; may organize by the subcategories &quot;biography,&quot; &quot;videos,&quot; &quot;music&quot; and &quot;concert information.&quot;  This means SEO strategies will adjust in order to optimize Web content for select sub categories, rather than select keywords only.
&lt;strong&gt;Search engines will become information portals.&lt;/strong&gt; Search engines have long been used as gateways to Web content.  But as a decisioning engine, Bing introduces a search engine that actually delivers Web content without sending users away to other destination sites.  A search for &quot;airfare to Denver&quot; shows avaiiable fares, pricing trends, a buy or wait recommendation, and a link to purchase.  Since we expect other search engines to follow Bing&#039;s lead, this means marketers should expect increased costs for search and display ads.  We also expect online media planners to adjust the sites where they buy.  We expect consumers to frequent Bing (and other similar search engines in its wake) instead of other portals (Yahoo) and preferred destination sites. 

&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: Bing! gaat live op 3 juni</p>
<p>En wat betekent Bing!? Hier een stuk van <a href="http://blogs.forrester.com/marketing/2009/05/microsoft-announced-today-its-bing-search-engine-a-decision-engine-that-will-replace-livecom-worldwide-as-of-june-3-a-dist.html" rel="nofollow">Forrester</a>. Interessant leesvoer:</p>
<p><em>What does Bing mean for interactive marketers?</em><br />
<em> </p>
<p><strong>More, quality search inventory.</strong> Today most advertisers buy search ads just with Google and Yahoo because Microsoft has a measly 8% share of searches &#8212; not enough reach to make buying search ads with MS worth the trouble.  Forrester expects Bing to change that.  We expect Bing to appeal to the savvy searcher seeking more relevant search results.<br />
<strong> </strong><br />
<strong>A new approach to SEO.</strong><br />
<strong></strong> Instead of Bing showing all sites that match the search engine&#8217;s algorithm, it will show just three results for a given &#8220;subcategory&#8221; related to a search.  For example, a search for &#8220;Britney Spears&#8221; may organize by the subcategories &#8221;biography,&#8221; &#8220;videos,&#8221; &#8220;music&#8221; and &#8220;concert information.&#8221;  This means SEO strategies will adjust in order to optimize Web content for select sub categories, rather than select keywords only.<br />
<strong>Search engines will become information portals.</strong> Search engines have long been used as gateways to Web content.  But as a decisioning engine, Bing introduces a search engine that actually delivers Web content without sending users away to other destination sites.  A search for &#8220;airfare to Denver&#8221; shows avaiiable fares, pricing trends, a buy or wait recommendation, and a link to purchase.  Since we expect other search engines to follow Bing&#8217;s lead, this means marketers should expect increased costs for search and display ads.  We also expect online media planners to adjust the sites where they buy.  We expect consumers to frequent Bing (and other similar search engines in its wake) instead of other portals (Yahoo) and preferred destination sites. </p>
<p></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

